Technologies in the Twilight Zone: Early Lie Detectors, Machine Learning and Reformist Legal Realism

18 Pages Posted: 8 May 2019

Date Written: April 7, 2019

Abstract

Contemporary discussions and disagreements about the deployment of machine learning, especially in criminal justice contexts, have no foreseeable end. Developers, practitioners and regulators could however usefully look back one hundred years to the similar arguments made when polygraph machines were first introduced in the United States. While polygraph devices and machine learning operate in distinctly different ways, at their heart, they both attempt to predict something about a person based on how others have behaved. This paper, through an historical perspective, examines the history of the polygraph within the justice system – both in courts and during criminal investigations - and draws parallels to today’s discussion. It can be argued that the promotion of lie detectors supported a reforming legal realist approach, something that continues today in the debates over the deployment of machine learning where ‘public good’ aims are in play, and raises questions around how key principles of the rule of law can best be upheld. Finally, this paper will propose a number of regulatory solutions informed by the early lie detector experience.

Keywords: machine learning, artificial intelligence, lie detector, polygraph, law, legal realism

JEL Classification: K10

Suggested Citation

Oswald, Marion, Technologies in the Twilight Zone: Early Lie Detectors, Machine Learning and Reformist Legal Realism (April 7, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3369586 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3369586

Marion Oswald (Contact Author)

University of Winchester ( email )

West Hill
Hampshire
Winchester, SO22 4NR
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
25
Abstract Views
300
PlumX Metrics