Regulating Recommending: Motivations, Considerations, and Principles
Forthcoming, European Journal of Law and Technology
48 Pages Posted: 3 Jun 2019 Last revised: 8 Dec 2019
Date Written: April 15, 2019
Internet regulation and 'online harms' are matters of much political and regulatory attention. This debate is beset by issues, including defining 'online harms', respecting freedom of expression, and others. While much of this debate has focused on content hosted by online platforms, comparatively little attention has been paid to the central role of algorithmic personalisation – or ‘recommending’ – by platforms in content dissemination in online environments and the problems to which this contributes. Focusing on recommender systems, i.e. the mechanism by which content is recommended by platforms, provides an alternative regulatory approach that avoids many of the pitfalls with addressing the hosting of content itself. This paper therefore explores motivations and considerations for regulating the use of recommender systems by online platforms. In doing so, this paper establishes a typology of online recommending, sets out various problems and consequences of recommending, and argues that recommending content is not one of the three activities for which information society service providers are afforded liability protections under the E-Commerce Directive. To address the identified problems and fill this legal gap, this paper proposes some principles for future regulation, and discusses approaches to oversight and compliance that could work with these principles.
Keywords: Internet Regulation; Platform Responsibility; Intermediary Liability; E-Commerce Directive; Recommender Systems
JEL Classification: K2; K24; L86; O31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation