Unjust Enrichment in the 'Fairchild Enclave': International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance Plc [2015] UKSC 33

(2017) 80 Modern Law Review 1150

23 Pages Posted: 6 Jun 2019

See all articles by KV Krishnaprasad

KV Krishnaprasad

National Law School of India University; University of Oxford; One Essex Court

Date Written: April 17, 2019

Abstract

In International Energy Group v Zurich Insurance, the Supreme Court considered the implications of the special rule in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd for insurers’ for employers’ liability. The question for the Court was whether, in the light of its earlier decision in Durham v BAI Ltd, insurers could be held liable for employees’ mesothelioma claims, even if the employer was not insured throughout the period of employment. The seven Justices unanimously held that insurers’ liability was proportionate to the period of insurance. In reaching that result, the majority recognised that the insurers were entitled to ‘equitable recoupment’ from insured-employers in respect of periods during which they were uninsured. This note critiques the recoupment right with an unjust enrichment lens.

Keywords: Unjust Enrichment, Restitution, Recoupment, Fairchild

Suggested Citation

KV, Krishnaprasad, Unjust Enrichment in the 'Fairchild Enclave': International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance Plc [2015] UKSC 33 (April 17, 2019). (2017) 80 Modern Law Review 1150, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3374055

Krishnaprasad KV (Contact Author)

National Law School of India University ( email )

Nagarbhavi
Bangalore, KS 560
India

University of Oxford ( email )

St Cross Building
St Cross Rd
Oxford, OX1 3UL
United Kingdom

One Essex Court ( email )

Temple
London
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
159
PlumX Metrics