Building a Better Bar Exam

Texas A&M Law Review, 2019, Volume 7, Issue 1

73 Pages Posted: 13 May 2019 Last revised: 27 Nov 2019

Date Written: March 28, 2019


In the wake of declining bar passage rates and limited placement options for law grads, a new bar exam has emerged: the UBE. Drawn to an allusive promise of portability, 36 U.S. jurisdictions have adopted the UBE. I predict that in a few years the UBE will be administered in all states and U.S. territories. The UBE has snowballed from an idea into the primary gateway for entry into the practice of law. But the UBE is not a panacea that will solve the bar passage problems that U.S. law schools face. Whether or not to adopt a uniform exam is no longer the question. Now that the UBE has firmly taken root, the question to be answered is what can be done to make sure that the UBE does less harm than good?

This paper will, in four parts, examine the meteoric rise and spread of the UBE and the potential costs of its quick adoption. Part one will survey the gradual move away from state law exams to the jurisdictionally neutral UBE. Part two will identify correlations between recent changes to the multistate exams and a stark national decline in bar passage rates. Part three will address the limitations of the UBE, including the misleading promise of score portability and the consequences of forum shopping. Part four will propose additional measures that can coexist with the UBE to counterbalance its limitations to make a better bar exam for our students and the clients they will serve.

Keywords: UBE, Uniform Bar Examination, Bar Exam, Multijurisdictional Practice, Cut Score, Score Portability

JEL Classification: K00, K30, K40, K49, K29

Suggested Citation

Griggs, Marsha, Building a Better Bar Exam (March 28, 2019). Texas A&M Law Review, 2019, Volume 7, Issue 1, Available at SSRN:

Marsha Griggs (Contact Author)

Washburn School of Law ( email )

1700 SW College Ave.
Topeka, KS 66621
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics