Startup Acquisitions, Error Costs, and Antitrust Policy

24 Pages Posted: 10 May 2019

See all articles by Kevin Bryan

Kevin Bryan

University of Toronto - Strategic Management

Erik Hovenkamp

USC Gould School of Law

Date Written: April 23, 2019

Abstract

Startup acquisitions by dominant incumbents, especially in high-tech, have recently attracted significant attention. Many researchers and practitioners worry about harms to competition or innovation. However, there has been very little antitrust enforcement in this area. This is emblematic of a prominent feature of modern antitrust law: a strong preference for erring on the side of non-enforcement. A leading rationale for this preference is the claim that market power self-corrects by attracting new entrants who discipline incumbents.

As a result, plaintiffs generally face very demanding evidentiary requirements, which are particularly hard to satisfy in the case of startup acquisitions. A typical startup is both new and small, providing little data for estimating competitive effects. Despite this uncertainty, it is unlikely that society is best served by a policy of near-universal inaction. Recent work in economics, both empirical and theoretical, identifies various harms to competition and innovation as a result of startup acquisitions in concentrated markets. Further, the traditional error cost argument is particularly in-apposite in this context, as startup acquisitions may be undertaken precisely because they forestall competitive entry. We therefore argue for expanded antitrust intervention (i.e. more than zero) in startup acquisitions by dominant incumbents. In practice, the acquirer’s market power and the transaction value may be useful signals of the risk of harm.

Keywords: antitrust, startup, start-up, acquisitions, error costs, mergers, vertical mergers, innovation, compulsory licensing

JEL Classification: L40, K21, L12, L26, O30, O32

Suggested Citation

Bryan, Kevin and Hovenkamp, Erik, Startup Acquisitions, Error Costs, and Antitrust Policy (April 23, 2019). University of Chicago Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3376966

Kevin Bryan

University of Toronto - Strategic Management ( email )

Canada

Erik Hovenkamp (Contact Author)

USC Gould School of Law ( email )

Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
71
Abstract Views
288
rank
329,657
PlumX Metrics