Popular Resistance in Cambodia: The Rationale Behind Government Response

Asian Politics & Policy, Forthcoming

19 Pages Posted: 8 May 2019

Date Written: April 24, 2019


Agrarian resistance often occurs as a result of expropriation and dispossession of poor farmers’ land and other properties. This paper examines how cost-benefit rational choice determined the government of Cambodia’s response to poor farmers’ resistance to large-scale land acquisition for an agro-industrial investment. Theoretically, whatever mechanism a government chooses to respond to resistance, the aim is to retain more benefits, especially political legitimacy. In this study, the government, in collaboration with private companies, opted for a combination of strong repression and partial concession in response to the resistance by the communities. The study argues that this response is basically determined by cost-benefit calculations. However, the purpose is not to retain political legitimacy as theoretically argued, but to protect the economic interests of the client-patron networks that had developed between foreign companies and the powerful local politico-commercial personages associated with the regime.

Keywords: Cambodia, concession, patron-client network, rational choice, repression, resistance

Suggested Citation

Young, Sokphea, Popular Resistance in Cambodia: The Rationale Behind Government Response (April 24, 2019). Asian Politics & Policy, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3377344 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3377344

Sokphea Young (Contact Author)

University College London ( email )

Gower Street
London, WC1E 6BT
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics