Turning Facts into Legal Guidelines and Reducing Judicial Uncertainty thru Methodological Innovations: Application to Contract Damages

48 Pages Posted: 27 May 2019

See all articles by Frank Giaoui

Frank Giaoui

Columbia Law School; Columbia University - Columbia Business School; Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne - Sorbonne Law School

Date Written: January 31, 2019

Abstract

From the perspective of both plaintiffs and defendants, the measurement of the damages quantum is obviously of the utmost importance. Therefore, it is surprising to see this process left entirely to the court’s discretion — especially since the quantum is traditionally considered a factual question. The result is that each litigation becomes a unique case calling for a sui generis outcome.

This article shows the limits of that approach. It leads to a structural uncertainty that is detrimental to the legitimate expectations of both parties. In practice, it deeply corrupts the fundamental principle of full recovery. I would argue there exist ways to move towards a model in which the valuation of damages will be a question of law that follows rules and methods whose application will be reviewable. In this article, I begin to explore some of these ways, specifically with respect to damages for breach of contract, using two simultaneous methodologies. The first is a comparison between French civil law, American common law and international commercial law, and the second is an empirical study involving both qualitative interviews with practitioners and the quantitative analysis of a proprietary sample of cases in which damages are difficult to measure. The article concludes with recommendations for judicial practices and a discussion of the possibility of predictive justice through shared compensatory damages schedules, which could eventually lead to artificial intelligence models.

Keywords: Breach of contract, full recovery, compensatory damages, economic loss, lost profits, quantum, expert witness, comparative law, empirical legal studies, common law, civil law, international commercial law, arbitration, reliance interest, expectation interest, consequential damages

JEL Classification: D22, D74, D82, D84, G32, G34, G38, F23, F61, K12, K15, K22, K33, K41, M13

Suggested Citation

Giaoui, Frank, Turning Facts into Legal Guidelines and Reducing Judicial Uncertainty thru Methodological Innovations: Application to Contract Damages (January 31, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3379763 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3379763

Frank Giaoui (Contact Author)

Columbia Law School ( email )

435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
+16464272737 (Phone)

Columbia University - Columbia Business School ( email )

3022 Broadway
New York, NY 10027
United States
+16464272737 (Phone)

Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne - Sorbonne Law School ( email )

12 Place du Panthéon
Paris, 75005
France
+33620986788 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
32
Abstract Views
197
PlumX Metrics