Erfurt Plus Councils: The Distinctive Relevance of the German Revolution of 1918-19

Forthcoming, Socialist History

20 Pages Posted: 17 May 2019

See all articles by Nicholas Vrousalis

Nicholas Vrousalis

Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus Institute for Philosophy and Economics (EIPE)

Date Written: April 29, 2019

Abstract

This paper defends the idea that the only feasible and desirable alternative to bourgeois democracy in 1918 Germany was a parliamentary democracy supported by workers’ councils. This alternative, which I will call council Erfurtianism, blazed a trail of political possibility from late November 1918 to the summer of 1920 that was eminently desirable and politically accessible to the German revolutionary left. Council Erfurtianism was consistently undermined by the leadership of the majority social democrats, with some help from the far left. A mixture of sectarianism and mistrust made revolutionary compromise impossible and elevated the ‘parliament vs. councils’ polarity from a secondary strategic issue, into a supreme question of (putative) principle. That sectarianism also accounted for two failed attempts to rekindle the revolutionary fire: the pro-socialisation strikes of March 1919 and the strike that ended the Kapp putsch, one year later.

Keywords: German revolution, workers’ councils, Arthur Rosenberg, Max Adler, Karl Kautsky, Rudolf Hilferding, Rätebewegung, Räterepublik, Weimar Republic

JEL Classification: N44, P20, P26

Suggested Citation

Vrousalis, Nicholas, Erfurt Plus Councils: The Distinctive Relevance of the German Revolution of 1918-19 (April 29, 2019). Forthcoming, Socialist History, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3379858

Nicholas Vrousalis (Contact Author)

Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus Institute for Philosophy and Economics (EIPE)

P.O. Box 1738
EIPE Office, Room H5-23
3000 Dr Rotterdam
Netherlands

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
36
Abstract Views
338
PlumX Metrics