Embedding Content or Interring Copyright: Does the Internet Need the 'Server Rule'?

61 Pages Posted: 14 May 2019

See all articles by Jane C. Ginsburg

Jane C. Ginsburg

Columbia University - Law School

Luke Budiardjo

Columbia University, Law School, Students

Date Written: May 3, 2019

Abstract

The “server rule” holds that online displays or performances of copyrighted content accomplished through “in-line” or “framing” hyperlinks do not trigger the exclusive rights of public display or performance unless the linker also possesses a copy of the underlying work. As a result, the rule shields a vast array of online activities from claims of direct copyright infringement, effectively exempting those activities from the reach of the Copyright Act. While the server rule has enjoyed relatively consistent adherence since its adoption in 2007, some courts have recently suggested a departure from that precedent, noting the doctrinal and statutory inconsistencies underlying it.

Authors and copyright owners have long lamented that the server rule’s immunization of certain online activities eviscerates their ability to control how their works are disseminated on the Internet. But many Internet users and commercial actors have incorporated the rule’s liability shield into their expectations about how the Internet does (and should) function. Accordingly, while authors and copyright owners foresee improved prospects for remuneration, many commentators and advocacy groups have expressed concerns regarding the recent judicial doubt about the validity of the server rule. They contend that, without the server rule, the Internet would cease to function as it does today.

However, these concerns overlook the applicable defenses—in particular, the defenses of safe harbor under § 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and express license—which, we expect, would take on a more significant role in a postserver rule world. In this Article, we explore the likely effect of the potential reversal of the server rule, taking into account these defenses. We conclude that the principal difference between copyright law with and without the server rule comes down to the author’s ability to obtain the removal of links to infringing content, and to authorize embedding of content from a source to which the public had lawful access.

Moreover, while the reversal of the server rule may interrupt a handful of online services that rely entirely on the unauthorized appropriation of copyrighted works, most online practices would likely continue unaltered in the post-server rule world.

Keywords: copyright, copyright law, internet, Copyright Act, server rule

Suggested Citation

Ginsburg, Jane C. and Budiardjo, Luke, Embedding Content or Interring Copyright: Does the Internet Need the 'Server Rule'? (May 3, 2019). Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2019; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-625. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3383656

Jane C. Ginsburg (Contact Author)

Columbia University - Law School ( email )

435 West 116th Street
Rm 710
New York, NY 10027
United States
212-854-3325 (Phone)
212-854-7946 (Fax)

Luke Budiardjo

Columbia University, Law School, Students ( email )

435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
65
Abstract Views
264
rank
355,656
PlumX Metrics