Cold Cognition, Hot Emotion, and the Training of Lawyers

49 Pages Posted: 14 May 2019

Date Written: April 10, 2019

Abstract

Recent advances in neuroscience have shown that cognition and emotion often work interdependently, operating as if emerging from a single faucet. This means that the stereotypes of a divided “cold cognition” and “hot emotion” are overly simplistic and inaccurate. The outdated but influential Langdellian approach to law, lawyering and legal education still places cognitive legal reasoning as the centerpiece. Instead, the cognition-emotion conceptualization should be revised so that positive emotion is expressly accepted, used, and managed within legal systems. Students and lawyers should be taught how to successfully feel and act like lawyers, as well as think like them.

Suggested Citation

Friedland, Steven, Cold Cognition, Hot Emotion, and the Training of Lawyers (April 10, 2019). Wake Forest Law Review, Forthcoming; Elon University Law Legal Studies Research Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3386184

Steven Friedland (Contact Author)

Elon University School of Law ( email )

201 N. Greene Street
Greensboro, NC 27401
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
66
Abstract Views
266
rank
339,691
PlumX Metrics