Just Because It’s a Phobia Doesn’t Mean You Shouldn’t Be Afraid

20 Pages Posted: 24 May 2019 Last revised: 28 Aug 2019

See all articles by David Enoch

David Enoch

Hebrew University - The Philosophy Department and the Law School

Date Written: May 18, 2019

Abstract

This is a book symposium contribution, on David Estlund’s forthcoming Utopophobia: On the Limits (If Any) of Political Philosophy, tentatively forthcoming in Philosophical Studies. I argue – in some parts, following my “Against Utopianism: Noncompliance and Multiple Agents”, in others going beyond that paper – that despite being right about some central issues (most centrally, that a judgment that society ought to act in some way is not refuted by the fact that the society won’t), still Estlund fails to exonerate his utopianism: I argue that Estund’s arguments purportedly showing the priority of aspirational theory over concessive theory fail; I argue against Estlund’s attempts to establish the practical value of ideal theory (conceding, of course, that it may have intellectual value, and that this may be value enough); and I argue that Estlund misdiagnoses some central anti-utopian sentiments, and that those, when properly diagnosed, are well-taken. I conclude with a diagnostic hypothesis of my own – that what motivates Eslund, despite protests to the contrary, is an unsupportable optimism about humanity.

Keywords: Ideal theory, utopianism, utopia, Estlund, Utopophobia

Suggested Citation

Enoch, David, Just Because It’s a Phobia Doesn’t Mean You Shouldn’t Be Afraid (May 18, 2019). Hebrew University of Jerusalem Legal Research Paper 19-15. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3390382 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3390382

David Enoch (Contact Author)

Hebrew University - The Philosophy Department and the Law School ( email )

Mount Scopus
Mount Scopus, IL 91905
Israel

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
81
Abstract Views
470
rank
326,858
PlumX Metrics