Beyond the 'Sinew of War': The Political Economy of Security as a Subfield

Posted: 28 May 2019

See all articles by Paul Poast

Paul Poast

University of Chicago - Department of Political Science

Date Written: May 2019

Abstract

Since at least Cicero, we have known that “money is the sinew of war.” Is it possible for a political economy of security (PES) subfield to contribute knowledge beyond Cicero's claim? This article aims to delineate the boundaries of a PES subfield by using the classic “guns versus butter” trade-off to define the existing literature within the subfield. Thinking seriously about this trade-off, including conditions under which a trade-off may not exist, raises a host of questions. The two most direct questions are: How does consuming “guns” influence the consumption of “butter”? And how does using “guns” influence the consumption of “butter”?

Suggested Citation

Poast, Paul, Beyond the 'Sinew of War': The Political Economy of Security as a Subfield (May 2019). Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 22, pp. 223-239, 2019. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3394064 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070912

Paul Poast (Contact Author)

University of Chicago - Department of Political Science ( email )

1101 East 58th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
65
PlumX Metrics