Litigation, Judicial Path-Dependence, and Legal Change
24 Pages Posted: 9 Nov 2004
Abstract
In this paper we consider the role that litigation and case selection play in the process of legal change. We examine the effect of judicial path dependence on the consolidation of liability rules and legal remedies, paying special attention to litigation between parties with different stakes. In the presence of asymmetric stakes, judicial path dependence may lead to consolidation or contraction of legal rules. We study the consequence of private litigation decisions on the contraction or consolidation of legal rules under various litigation and judicial environments. We also consider the relevance of the degree of asymmetry in the litigation stakes, the existence and nature of positive litigation costs, and the weight of past precedents on the ongoing process of legal evolution.
JEL Classification: K0, K40, K13, K41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Litigation and the Evolution of Legal Remedies: A Dynamic Model
By Vincy Fon and Francesco Parisi
-
The Rise and Fall of Efficiency in the Common Law: A Supply-Side Analysis
-
Judicial Precedents in Civil Law Systems: A Dynamic Analysis
By Vincy Fon and Francesco Parisi
-
Litigation and Legal Evolution: Does Procedure Matter?
By Barbara Luppi and Francesco Parisi
-
Quantitative Methods in Comparative Law
By Francesco Parisi and Barbara Luppi