Legal Tests in EU Competition Law: Taxonomy and Operation

34 Pages Posted: 12 Jun 2019 Last revised: 19 Jun 2019

See all articles by Pablo Ibáñez Colomo

Pablo Ibáñez Colomo

London School of Economics - Law Department

Date Written: May 27, 2019

Abstract

• There is not a unique legal test in EU competition law. There is conduct that is prima facie unlawful irrespective of its effects, and conduct that is lawful. In between, some practices are prohibited where actual or likely effects can be shown.

• This paper seeks to map the various tests by which conduct is assessed under Articles 101 and 102 TFEU and to explain the rationale and operation in practice of these tests.

• The analysis explains, inter alia, how firms can rebut the presumption that practices are capable of having restrictive effects in light of the relevant economic and legal context of which they are a part.

• The paper also explains why indispensability is an element of the legal test in the context of some practices (for instance, refusals to deal) but not others (for instance, 'margin squeeze' and tying conduct). In this sense, it is submitted that, as the law stands, the nature of the remedy determines the application of one test or the other.

Keywords: Article 101 TFEU, Article 102 TFEU, Legal test, Competition, Cartels

JEL Classification: K21, L14, L24, L41, L42

Suggested Citation

Ibáñez Colomo, Pablo, Legal Tests in EU Competition Law: Taxonomy and Operation (May 27, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3394889 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3394889

Pablo Ibáñez Colomo (Contact Author)

London School of Economics - Law Department ( email )

Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
257
Abstract Views
776
rank
117,352
PlumX Metrics