Calculating SEC Whistleblower Awards: A Theoretical Approach

40 Pages Posted: 1 Oct 2019 Last revised: 3 Oct 2019

See all articles by Amanda M. Rose

Amanda M. Rose

Vanderbilt University - Law School

Date Written: May 28, 2019

Abstract

The Dodd-Frank Act provides that SEC whistleblower awards must equal not less than 10 and not more than 30 percent of the monetary penalties collected in the action to which they relate; SEC Rule 21F-6 provides criteria that the SEC may consider in determining the award percentage within the statutory bounds. When applying the Rule 21F-6 criteria, the SEC is required to think only in percentage terms, ignoring the dollar payout the award will actually yield. Last June the SEC proposed to change this, at least in cases where the existing methodology would yield an award less than $2 million or greater than $30 million. The proposed revisions to Rule 21F-6 have garnered controversy and have not yet been implemented. Do they make sense? To begin to answer that question requires an understanding of the purpose of whistleblower awards and an evaluation of how well the existing award calculation methodology advances that purpose. This Article provides both. The analysis suggests that the controversial proposed amendments to Rule 21F-6 are warranted, but incomplete.

Keywords: whistleblower, whistleblowers, bounty payments, securities and exchange commission, SEC, Rule 21F-6, incentives, fraud, non-monetary penalties

JEL Classification: K20, K22, K40, K42

Suggested Citation

Rose, Amanda M., Calculating SEC Whistleblower Awards: A Theoretical Approach (May 28, 2019). Vanderbilt Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3395503 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3395503

Amanda M. Rose (Contact Author)

Vanderbilt University - Law School ( email )

131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
115
Abstract Views
529
rank
244,322
PlumX Metrics