Good Enough for Government Work? Life-Evaluation and Public Policy

30 Pages Posted: 13 Jun 2019 Last revised: 7 Oct 2019

See all articles by Noel Semple

Noel Semple

University of Windsor Faculty of Law

Date Written: May 31, 2019

Abstract

A life-evaluation question asks a person to quantify his or her overall satisfaction with life, at the time when the question is asked. If the goal of public policy is to make individuals’ lives better, does it follow that maximizing aggregate life-evaluations constitutes policy success? This paper argues that life-evaluation data provides a solid basis for welfare-consequentialist policy-making. This is illustrated by the successful argument for expanding state-funded mental health services in the United Kingdom.

However, life-evaluations do not always provide a complete account of individual welfare. Policy-makers therefore must sometimes inquire into the extent to which individuals’ preferences would be fulfilled, if different policies were to be adopted. This article proposes synthesizing life-evaluationist and preferentist data about individual welfare, as a basis for rational policy-making.

Keywords: happiness; welfare; public policy; preferences; life-evaluation; mental health

Suggested Citation

Semple, Noel, Good Enough for Government Work? Life-Evaluation and Public Policy (May 31, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3397151 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3397151

Noel Semple (Contact Author)

University of Windsor Faculty of Law ( email )

401 Sunset Ave.
Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4
Canada

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
7
Abstract Views
114
PlumX Metrics