FTC v. Qualcomm: New Frontiers in the Antitrust-IP Interface

Forthcoming, Regulatory Review.

4 Pages Posted: 13 Jun 2019

See all articles by Erik Hovenkamp

Erik Hovenkamp

Harvard Law School; Yale University - Law School

Date Written: May 31, 2019

Abstract

The Federal Trade Commission recently scored a substantial victory in its antitrust suit against Qualcomm. The case represents a novel confluence of standard-setting and IP licensing issues with bedrock antitrust subjects: tying and exclusive dealing. It also takes a surprising turn in resuscitating the long-dormant doctrine of the antitrust “duty to deal.” In this short essay, I review and evaluate the court’s decision in FTC v. Qualcomm. The analysis of Qualcomm’s exclusive dealing is sound and very likely correct. However, the court’s duty-to-deal analysis sits on shakier ground, omitting consideration of potential immunity under the Patent Act and sidestepping thorny questions on the appropriate source of law.

Keywords: Antitrust, FRAND, patent, licensing, exclusive dealing, tying, loyalty discounting

Suggested Citation

Hovenkamp, Erik, FTC v. Qualcomm: New Frontiers in the Antitrust-IP Interface (May 31, 2019). Forthcoming, Regulatory Review.. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3397312

Erik Hovenkamp (Contact Author)

Harvard Law School ( email )

Cambridge, MA
United States

Yale University - Law School ( email )

New Haven, CT

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
170
rank
172,881
Abstract Views
887
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information