Backdoor Balancing and the Consequences of Legal Change

57 Pages Posted: 14 Jun 2019 Last revised: 23 Oct 2019

See all articles by Elizabeth Earle Beske

Elizabeth Earle Beske

American University - Washington College of Law

Date Written: August 15, 2019

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court has employed various mechanisms to blunt the systemic impact of legal change. The Warren Court balanced the interests advanced by new rules against the disruption of their retroactive application and frequently limited new rules to prospective effect. The Rehnquist Court decisively rejected this approach in the mid-1990s and committed itself to full adjudicative retroactivity as to pending cases. This Article argues that, although the Court slammed a door, it subsequently opened a window. The Court has spent the intervening decades devising ostensibly independent and unrelated doctrines to mitigate disruption. Despite the Rehnquist Court’s insistence that these doctrines do not relate to retroactivity, they reflect the same balance and, in almost every case, yield the same results as Warren-era balancing. This Article makes the descriptive case that the balancing of interests has survived intact and the normative case that finding a mechanism for softening the blow of legal change promotes respect for existing rules and the Court’s institutional legitimacy. Finally, this Article explores how the Court’s sub silentio balancing is likely to play out in the next big retroactivity challenge, the Appointments Clause context post-Lucia v. SEC.

Keywords: Federal Courts, Retroactivity, Precedent, Article III

Suggested Citation

Beske, Elizabeth Earle, Backdoor Balancing and the Consequences of Legal Change (August 15, 2019). Washington Law Review, 94 Wash. L. Rev. 645 (2019), American University, WCL Research Paper No. 2019-12, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3398384

Elizabeth Earle Beske (Contact Author)

American University - Washington College of Law ( email )

4300 Nebraska Ave NW, Washington, DC
4300 Nebraska Ave NW, Washington, DC
Washington, DC 20016
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
46
Abstract Views
565
PlumX Metrics