Case and Legislation Notes: Surrogacy, Child’s Welfare, and Public Policy in Adoption Applications — UKM v Attorney-General
11 Pages Posted: 4 Jun 2019
Date Written: March 1, 2019
Abstract
This case note discusses the Singapore High Court case of UKM, in which an order was granted to a gay man to adopt his biological son conceived through a gestational surrogacy arrangement in the United States. In particular, the High Court’s assessment of the welfare of the child and of public policy, in light of two factors—the prohibition of male homosexual acts in section 377A of the Penal Code and the de facto curtailment of domestic surrogacy by Singapore’s restrictive rules relating to the use of assisted reproduction technology services—will be examined.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Tan, Seow Hon, Case and Legislation Notes: Surrogacy, Child’s Welfare, and Public Policy in Adoption Applications —
UKM v Attorney-General (March 1, 2019). Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, Mar 19, pp 263-273 (2019), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3398735
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.