Specific Performance As a Contractual Remedy in Chinese Courts: An Empirical Study

(2019) 7(1) The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 26-54

Centre for Chinese & Comparative Law Research Paper

29 Pages Posted: 4 Jun 2019 Last revised: 7 Jul 2019

Date Written: June 4, 2019

Abstract

This article presents an empirical study that employs statistical data analysis and contextual examination to investigate the prevalence of specific performance (SP) in Chinese courts as a contractual remedy in civil and commercial disputes. The findings of this study reveal that Chinese courts favour damages over SP in breach of contract cases. In addition, Chinese judges take a far more proactive role than their foreign counterparts in the preliminary stages of a trial to persuade parties to seek damages instead of SP. Furthermore, defendants are more likely to settle for damages during trials at first instance courts where SP is available than is the case where further trials are conducted at appellate courts. The findings also suggest that, contrary to what is commonly believed, the supervision cost associated with an SP order is not a determinative factor in judges’ consideration of whether to grant the order.

Suggested Citation

Chen, Lei, Specific Performance As a Contractual Remedy in Chinese Courts: An Empirical Study (June 4, 2019). (2019) 7(1) The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 26-54, Centre for Chinese & Comparative Law Research Paper , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3398797

Lei Chen (Contact Author)

Durham Law School ( email )

Palatine Centre
South Road
Durham, DH1 3LE
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
65
Abstract Views
350
rank
405,427
PlumX Metrics