Financing the Judiciary in the Netherlands: Between Work Overload in the Courts and Government Control of the Judicial Budget

2 Pages Posted: 7 Jun 2019

Date Written: February 7, 2019

Abstract

The Netherlands has a well-balanced but complicated system for financing the judicial functions of government. Judicial appropriations are determined by the collective production of the ordinary courts, the Central Appeal Board, and the Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal. Different formula rates are applied to each jurisdiction. For example, Plural Judge Panel cases deliver far more money than cases that are decided by a single judge. Below, I argue why, from a constitutional perspective, the appropriations process for funding the Dutch judiciary has undesirable consequences for the functioning of judges and courts.

Suggested Citation

Langbroek, Philip M., Financing the Judiciary in the Netherlands: Between Work Overload in the Courts and Government Control of the Judicial Budget (February 7, 2019). International Journal for Court Administration, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2019. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3399899

Philip M. Langbroek (Contact Author)

Montaigne Centre ( email )

Newtonlaan+201
Utrecht, +3584+BH
Netherlands

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
4
Abstract Views
28
PlumX Metrics