Hedge Fund Performance Persistence: Do the Country of Domicile and the Investment Strategy Matter?

42 Pages Posted: 21 Jun 2019

Date Written: June 4, 2019

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the performance persistence of 5619 Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) between 1995-2016. We focus on the world’s four most saturated domiciles (United States of America - USA, Cayman Islands - CAYI, Luxemburg - LUX and Ireland - IRL) and the four most commonly employed strategies (Long-Short-Equity - LSE, Fixed-Income - FIX, Commodity-Trading-Advisors - CTA and Multi-Strategy - MLTI). We investigate a feature of AIFs that is overlooked in the academic and professional literature: the combined impact of geolocation and investment style. We report performance persistence in almost all cases when analysing the individual domicile or strategy. However, the combination of domiciles and strategies reveals weak persistence in some cases and no persistence or complete reversal in others. The results of our cross-comparison show that the sole reliance on the individual domicile/investment strategy focused clusters can be grossly misleading and lead to capital losses.

Keywords: hedge funds, persistence, performance

JEL Classification: F3, G23, G11

Suggested Citation

Klubinski, William Joseph and Verousis, Thanos, Hedge Fund Performance Persistence: Do the Country of Domicile and the Investment Strategy Matter? (June 4, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3401303 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3401303

William Joseph Klubinski (Contact Author)

Essex Business School

Wivenhoe Park
Colchester, CO4 3SQ
United Kingdom

Thanos Verousis

Essex Business School ( email )

United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
193
PlumX Metrics