Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Hearing on the State of Patent Eligibility in America

9 Pages Posted: 18 Jun 2019

See all articles by Paul R. Gugliuzza

Paul R. Gugliuzza

Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law

Date Written: June 4, 2019

Abstract

This testimony, prepared for a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee on the State of Patent Eligibility in America, argues that the eligibility requirement plays a crucial role in reducing litigation costs by giving courts a mechanism to quickly dismiss infringement claims that plainly lack merit. Most patent validity requirements, including novelty, nonobviousness, and adequate disclosure, are viewed by courts to turn on disputed questions of fact, meaning that they cannot be resolved until after a trial or, at the earliest, shortly before trial on a motion for summary judgment. Eligibility, by contrast, is often viewed to present a question of law, meaning that it can be — and often is — resolved at the earliest stages of the case — before the costly discovery process begins. The legislation currently being considered by the Committee, which would effectively abolish the patent eligibility requirement, would take away a crucial tool courts can use to end particularly weak cases at low cost.

Keywords: patents, patent eligibility

Suggested Citation

Gugliuzza, Paul R., Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Hearing on the State of Patent Eligibility in America (June 4, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3402046 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3402046

Paul R. Gugliuzza (Contact Author)

Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law ( email )

1719 N. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
17
Abstract Views
270
PlumX Metrics