M&A Due Diligence, Post-Acquisition Performance, and Financial Reporting for Business Combinations

Posted: 20 Jun 2019

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: January 18, 2019

Abstract

Before completing an M&A transaction, acquiring firms conduct due diligence. This process provides acquiring firms with a more informed assessment of the expected costs, benefits, and risks of an acquisition and offers one last opportunity to renegotiate or terminate an M&A transaction. However, acquiring firms must trade off the costs and benefits of performing additional due diligence versus completing the acquisition. Based on an analysis of the time to negotiate the acquisition agreement and complete the transaction, I predict and find that competitive pressures, short-term financial reporting incentives, and agency problems are associated with less due diligence. I also find that less due diligence is associated with lower post-acquisition profitability, a higher probability of acquisition-related goodwill impairments, and lower quality fair value estimates for the acquired assets and liabilities. These findings highlight due diligence as an important factor explaining cross-sectional variation in post-acquisition performance and financial reporting for business combinations.

Keywords: Mergers and Acquisitions, Due Diligence, Post-Acquisition Performance, Goodwill, Fair Value

JEL Classification: D82, G34, M41

Suggested Citation

Wangerin, Daniel D., M&A Due Diligence, Post-Acquisition Performance, and Financial Reporting for Business Combinations (January 18, 2019). Contemporary Accounting Research, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3404504

Daniel D. Wangerin (Contact Author)

Wisconsin School of Business ( email )

975 University Avenue
4104 Grainger Hall
Madison, WI 53706
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
474
PlumX Metrics