Inaccurate Statistical Discrimination: An Identification Problem
57 Pages Posted: 19 Jun 2019 Last revised: 23 Mar 2021
There are 2 versions of this paper
Inaccurate Statistical Discrimination: An Identification Problem
Inaccurate Statistical Discrimination: An Identification Problem
Date Written: March 20, 2021
Abstract
Discrimination, defined as differential treatment by group identity, is widely studied in economics. Its source is often categorized as taste-based or statistical (belief-based)—a valuable distinction for policy design and welfare analysis. How-ever, in many situations individuals may have inaccurate beliefs about the relevant characteristics of different groups. This paper demonstrates that this possibility creates an identification problem when isolating the source of discrimination. A review of the empirical discrimination literature in economics reveals that a small minority of papers—fewer than 7%—consider inaccurate beliefs. We show both theoretically and experimentally that, if not accounted for, such inaccurate statistical discrimination will be misclassified as taste-based. We then examine three alternative methodologies for differentiating between different sources of discrimination: varying the amount of information presented to evaluators, eliciting their beliefs, and presenting them with accurate information. Importantly, the latter can be used to differentiate whether inaccurate beliefs are due to a lack of information or motivated factors.
Keywords: Discrimination, Inaccurate Beliefs, Model misspecification
JEL Classification: D90, J71
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation