Detention as Deterrence

22 Pages Posted: 24 Jun 2019

Date Written: January 7, 2019

Abstract

Over the past few decades, the federal government has justified the use of immigration detention on the basis that it deters unauthorized migration. Simply put, the idea is that detention will send a message that harsh consequences await apprehended migrants, and that such a message will discourage individuals from undertaking the journey to seek entry into the United States. This Essay applies insights from research on deterrence effects of criminal law to explain why immigration detention is unlikely to produce the intended behavioral effects that some policymakers desire. Specifically, I explore three hurdles to achieving deterrence through immigration law: the legal knowledge hurdle, the rational choice hurdle, and the perceived net cost hurdle. I conclude by discussing key questions that detention-as-deterrence policy raises for future research and policy in this area.

Keywords: immigration detention, deterrence, criminal law

Suggested Citation

Ryo, Emily, Detention as Deterrence (January 7, 2019). Stanford Law Review, Vol. 71, 2019, USC CLASS Research Paper No. CLASS19-15, USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 19-15, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3406461

Emily Ryo (Contact Author)

Duke Law School ( email )

210 Science Drive
Durham, NC 27708
United States
6502483855 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
113
Abstract Views
949
Rank
499,914
PlumX Metrics