Predicting Danger in Immigration Courts

51 Pages Posted: 24 Jun 2019

See all articles by Emily Ryo

Emily Ryo

University of Southern California Gould School of Law

Date Written: June 19, 2019

Abstract

Every year, the US government detains thousands of noncitizens in removal proceedings on the basis that they might pose a threat to public safety if released during the pendency of their removal proceedings. Using original audio recording data on immigration bond hearings, this study examines immigration judges’ determinations regarding which noncitizens pose a danger to the community. My multivariate analysis that controls for a variety of detainee background characteristics and criminal-conviction-related measures produced three main findings. First, I find that Central Americans are more likely to be deemed dangerous than non-Central Americans. Second, I find that detainees with attorneys are less likely to be deemed dangerous than pro se detainees. Finally, my analysis shows that whereas felony and violent convictions are associated with higher odds of being deemed dangerous, the recency of criminal convictions and the total number of convictions are not predictive of danger determinations. Together, these findings provide new insights into the socio-legal construction of immigrant criminality.

Keywords: immigration courts, immigration bond hearings, danger determinations

Suggested Citation

Ryo, Emily, Predicting Danger in Immigration Courts (June 19, 2019). Law and Social Inquiry, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2019, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3406467

Emily Ryo (Contact Author)

University of Southern California Gould School of Law ( email )

699 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
26
Abstract Views
343
PlumX Metrics