No Cover for Abusers; California Must Close Gap in its Duty-to-Report Law
San Francisco Chronicle (2019)
3 Pages Posted: 24 Jun 2019 Last revised: 10 Aug 2020
Date Written: June 23, 2019
The #MeToo movement has emphasized not only how rampant sexual abuse is, but also how frequently third parties disregard — or even enable — it. California is an epicenter of this movement with many of the highest-profile instances of both assault and bystanderism occurring here, particularly in Hollywood. In perhaps the most notorious case, at least 16 people admitted witnessing or knowing of Harvey Weinstein’s sexual misconduct but remaining silent; his behavior was infamous within both Miramax and the Weinstein Co., giants in the entertainment industry. Although California has a duty-to-report law for certain illegal activities, the statute does not require reporting sexual abuse, like Weinstein’s, committed against anyone older than 13 years of age. Recent events and an examination of other states’ laws compel modifying California’s statute to include older victims and permit both fewer and more exceptions in certain contexts.
Keywords: sexual violence, rape, sexual misconduct, sexual abuse, criminal law, criminal procedure, Bad Samaritan laws, duty to report, state law, bystanders, upstanders, punishment, prevention, deterrence, incentives, metoo, California, Harvey Weinstein, Sherrice Iverson, Jason Strohmeyer, David Cash
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation