Institutional Analysis, Polycentricity, and Federalism in the Bloomington School: Social Order Through Evolution or Design?

32 Pages Posted: 24 Jun 2019 Last revised: 25 Aug 2019

See all articles by Rosolino Candela

Rosolino Candela

Mercatus Center at George Mason University

Date Written: June 23, 2019

Abstract

The particular focus of this chapter will be to analyze institutional change from an Ostromian perspective by analyzing the relationship between self-governance, polycentricity, and federalism. Throughout work of Elinor and Vincent Ostrom, there exist two consistent themes regarding the importance of federalism for polycentric governance. First, the Ostroms emphasized that the institutional conditions of federalism are a human artifact, based upon choice and deliberation. However, given their emphasis on processes of learning among human beings, this second theme suggests, as I argue in this chapter, a bi-directionality in institutional analysis in the Ostromian framework. Though federalism and polycentric governance are based on deliberate choice, such an institutional framework facilitates learning and the adaptive potential of human beings, leading to innovative institutional changes to reinforce social cooperation between individuals.

Keywords: Federalism; Polycentricity; F.A. Hayek; Elinor Ostrom Vincent Ostrom; Spontaneous Order

JEL Classification: D73; P14; P16

Suggested Citation

Candela, Rosolino, Institutional Analysis, Polycentricity, and Federalism in the Bloomington School: Social Order Through Evolution or Design? (June 23, 2019). GMU Working Paper in Economics No. 19-28. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3408548 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3408548

Rosolino Candela (Contact Author)

Mercatus Center at George Mason University ( email )

4400 University Drive
Fairfax, VA 22030
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
25
Abstract Views
160
PlumX Metrics