Negative Peer Disclosure

57 Pages Posted: 2 Jul 2019 Last revised: 26 Oct 2019

See all articles by Sean Cao

Sean Cao

Georgia State University - J. Mack Robinson College of Business

Vivian W. Fang

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - Department of Accounting

Lijun (Gillian) Lei

University of North Carolina at Greensboro

Date Written: October 24, 2019

Abstract

This paper provides first evidence of negative peer disclosure (NPD), an emerging corporate strategy to publicize adverse news about industry peers on social media. Consistent with NPDs being implicit positive self-disclosures, disclosing firms experience a two-day abnormal return of 1.6-1.7% over the market and industry. Further exploring the benefits and costs of such disclosure, we find that NPD propensity increases with the degree of product market rivalry and technology proximity and that disclosing firms exhibit better operating performance than non-disclosing peers in the year following NPD. These results rationalize peer disclosure and extend the scope of the literature beyond self-disclosure.

Keywords: Peer Disclosure, Spillover, Product Market Rivalry, Technology Proximity, Social Media

JEL Classification: G14, L1, M41, O30

Suggested Citation

Cao, Sean S. and Fang, Vivian W. and Lei, Lijun, Negative Peer Disclosure (October 24, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3413317 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3413317

Sean S. Cao

Georgia State University - J. Mack Robinson College of Business ( email )

P.O. Box 4050
Atlanta, GA 30303-3083
United States

Vivian W. Fang (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - Department of Accounting ( email )

321 19th Avenue South
Room 3-109
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.vivianfang.org

Lijun Lei

University of North Carolina at Greensboro ( email )

P.O.Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27412
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
126
Abstract Views
914
rank
229,778
PlumX Metrics