The Effects of Rule-Based Versus Principle-Based Accounting Estimates on Auditors’ Going Concern Assessments

58 Pages Posted: 7 Jul 2019

See all articles by Herita T. Akamah

Herita T. Akamah

University of Nebraska at Lincoln - School of Accountancy

Keith Czerney

University of Missouri-Columbia

Thomas C. Omer

University of Nebraska at Lincoln - School of Accountancy

Date Written: July 3, 2019

Abstract

This study investigates whether auditors use information in accounting estimates when making going concern assessments and whether the usefulness of information in accounting estimates to auditors depends on whether the estimate is prepared following a rule-based standard or a principle-based standard. We use goodwill impairments and increases in the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, both of which could be indicative of poor financial condition, to operationalize rule-based and principle-based accounting estimates, respectively. Using a sample of U.S. public companies for the period 2005 – 2015, we find that both rule-based and principle-based estimates inform auditor going concern assessments and assessments of the likelihood of failure. Auditors, however, appear to rely more on rule-based estimates when assessing going concern, consistent with auditors placing greater weight on information that is more familiar to audit. The results of a path analysis show that a going concern opinion subsumes more of the information in rule-based estimates when predicting the likelihood of company failure, further supporting this inference. Our research should be of interest to standard setters, auditors, investors, and academics, who continue to evaluate the role of estimates in financial reporting and the usefulness of estimates for decision-making in various contexts.

Keywords: accounting estimates, auditors, rule-based standards, principle-based standards, going concern opinions, company failure

JEL Classification: M40, M41, M42, H25

Suggested Citation

Akamah, Herita T. and Czerney, Keith and Omer, Thomas C., The Effects of Rule-Based Versus Principle-Based Accounting Estimates on Auditors’ Going Concern Assessments (July 3, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3414626 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3414626

Herita T. Akamah

University of Nebraska at Lincoln - School of Accountancy ( email )

307 College of Business Administration
Lincoln, NE 68588-0488
United States

Keith Czerney (Contact Author)

University of Missouri-Columbia ( email )

College of Business
Columbia, MO 65211
United States

Thomas C. Omer

University of Nebraska at Lincoln - School of Accountancy ( email )

307 College of Business Administration
Lincoln, NE 68588-0488
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
116
Abstract Views
629
rank
269,763
PlumX Metrics