Submission to Review of the Mandatory Data Retention Regime Prescribed by Part 5-1A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (CTH) (‘TIA Act’)

24 Pages Posted: 9 Jul 2019

See all articles by Monika Zalnieriute

Monika Zalnieriute

University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law

Genna Churches

University of New South Wales (UNSW), Faculty of Law

Date Written: June 28, 2019

Abstract

This submission seeks to respond to the terms of reference raised by Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security in its Review of the Mandatory Data Retention Regime prescribed by Part 5-1A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (CTH) (‘TIA Act’). As scholars working at the intersection of law and technology, we are somewhat comforted to see the review of the Data Retention Regime, led by the Joint Committee and mandated by legislation, as we believe that reform in this area is important for Australia. In this submission, we draw upon some of the research conducted by Technologies and Rule of Law stream researchers to make suggestions on how we think the current data retention regime should be reformed. We also seek to provide comparisons with the recent developments in other jurisdictions. In 2015, the Australian Government amended the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (Cth) (‘TIA Act’) to introduce a statutory obligation for telecommunication and internet service providers (‘carriers/CSPs/ISPs’) to retain a specific dataset of metadata relating to their subscribers for a period of two years. This data retention scheme was the culmination of rumour and inuendo surrounding a proposed scheme beginning in 2010. Data retention schemes have been part of five different inquiries, four of which questioned the necessity of a data retention scheme and the types of data proposed to be retained and one review which recommended a data retention scheme. The Amendment made specific data which once would have fallen under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) retainable for a period of two years.

Keywords: data retention, metadata, mandatory data retention scheme, right to privacy, data protection, expectation of privacy, warrant, Digital Rights Ireland, Tele2 Sverige, personal information, location data

Suggested Citation

Zalnieriute, Monika and Churches, Genna, Submission to Review of the Mandatory Data Retention Regime Prescribed by Part 5-1A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (CTH) (‘TIA Act’) (June 28, 2019). UNSW Law Research Paper No. 19-46, 2019. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3416959 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3416959

Monika Zalnieriute

University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law ( email )

Sydney, New South Wales 2052
Australia

Genna Churches (Contact Author)

University of New South Wales (UNSW), Faculty of Law ( email )

Sydney
Australia

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
16
Abstract Views
257
PlumX Metrics