Air Pollution, Affect, and Forecasting Bias: Evidence from Chinese Financial Analysts
35 Pages Posted: 17 Jul 2019
Date Written: July 15, 2019
Abstract
We document a negative relation between air pollution during corporate site visits by investment analysts and subsequent earnings forecasts. After accounting for analyst, weather, and firm characteristics, an extreme worsening of air quality from “good/excellent” to “severely polluted” is associated with a more than 1 percentage point lower profit forecast, relative to realized profits. We explore heterogeneity in the pollution-forecast relation to understand better the underlying mechanism. Pollution only affects forecasts that are announced in the weeks immediately following a visit, indicating that mood likely plays a role, and the effect of pollution is less pronounced when analysts from different brokerages visit on the same date, suggesting a debiasing effect of multiple perspectives. Finally, there is suggestive evidence of adaptability to environmental circumstances – forecasts from analysts based in high pollution cities are relatively unaffected by site visit pollution.
Keywords: Pollution, Forecasting bias, Investment analysts, Adaptation
JEL Classification: D91, G41,Q5
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
