Do Fiduciary Duties Matter?

Corporate Governance, VOL. 11 NO. 5 2011, pp. 541-548

8 Pages Posted: 29 Jul 2019

See all articles by A. Joseph Warburton

A. Joseph Warburton

Syracuse University - College of Law; Syracuse University - Whitman School of Management

Date Written: 2011

Abstract

Much of the existing literature on firm governance and investor protection focuses on the corporation and, hence, takes organizational form as a given. By comparing trusts and corporations, this paper examines governance at a more fundamental level and exploits heterogeneity in corporate and trust fiduciary duties. Using data from the British mutual fund industry, I find that mutual funds organized in trust form charge significantly lower fees and take on less risk than equivalent mutual funds organized in corporate form. Evidence also suggests that the trusts tend to underperform their corporate counterparts, even after adjusting for differences in risk. The results have implications for corporate governance design, suggesting that heightened fiduciary duties can enhance investor protection by mitigating agency conflict and managerial risk taking, though at the possible cost of inferior risk-adjusted performance.

Keywords: Fiduciary Duties, Organizational Form, Corporate Governance, Mutual Funds, Trusts

Suggested Citation

Warburton, A. Joseph, Do Fiduciary Duties Matter? (2011). Corporate Governance, VOL. 11 NO. 5 2011, pp. 541-548 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423705

A. Joseph Warburton (Contact Author)

Syracuse University - College of Law ( email )

Syracuse, NY 13244-1030
United States

Syracuse University - Whitman School of Management ( email )

Syracuse, NY
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
68
Abstract Views
537
Rank
664,168
PlumX Metrics