A Tale of Two Courts

Cornell Law Review Online, Forthcoming 2020

U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3432135

13 Pages Posted: 8 Aug 2019 Last revised: 7 Oct 2019

Date Written: August 11, 2019


Widespread concern regarding the U.S. Supreme Court is pushing scholars and politicians to look for truly innovative solutions. Two recent proposals, the Supreme Court Lottery and the Balanced Bench, advocate for institutional and procedural reforms that are untested in the American context. This Essay, A Tale of Two Courts, offers concrete reasons why many aspects of these proposals are worrisome by drawing on a natural experiment involving the supreme court of another country, India. I show how the Indian Court has long exemplified several of the practices or design elements featured in the Lottery Court and Balanced Bench, and how these features have functioned in real life. In doing so, the Essay offers insights into court design and functioning that are simply unavailable from within American constitutional experience.

Keywords: Supreme Court, judicial reform, United States, India, comparative law

Suggested Citation

Das Acevedo, Deepa, A Tale of Two Courts (August 11, 2019). Cornell Law Review Online, Forthcoming 2020, U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3432135, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3432135 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3432135

Deepa Das Acevedo (Contact Author)

Emory University School of Law ( email )

1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics