Barnette and Masterpiece Cakeshop: Some Unanswered Questions

23 Pages Posted: 15 Aug 2019 Last revised: 19 Aug 2019

See all articles by Abner S. Greene

Abner S. Greene

Fordham University School of Law

Date Written: August 14, 2019

Abstract

This symposium piece addresses three issues stemming from the Court’s Masterpiece Cakeshop case and that case’s relationship to West Virginia v. Barnette. First, it discusses the relationship between claims for exemption from laws of general applicability and as-applied claims. Second, it addresses the issue most discussed in the Cakeshop briefs and oral argument, but not ultimately resolved by the Court: what counts as compelled speech in the setting of provision of services such as custom-made wedding cakes? Third, it intervenes in the fascinating sidebar between Justice Kagan and Justice Gorsuch regarding the state commission’s refusal to sanction bakers who wouldn’t make cakes condemning homosexuality, and the relationship between that refusal and the commission’s deeming Jack Phillips in violation of state law by declining to make a custom cake for a same-sex wedding celebration.

Suggested Citation

Greene, Abner S., Barnette and Masterpiece Cakeshop: Some Unanswered Questions (August 14, 2019). 13 FIU L. Rev. 667 (2019); Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3437456. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3437456

Abner S. Greene (Contact Author)

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
53
Abstract Views
169
rank
381,703
PlumX Metrics