中国金融监管体制改革的逻辑与路径:国际经验与本土选择 (The Logics and Path of China’s Financial Regulatory Structure: International Experiences and Local Choice)

2019(3) 法学家 [Jurist] 124-137

23 Pages Posted: 3 Sep 2019 Last revised: 4 Nov 2019

See all articles by (Robin) Hui Huang

(Robin) Hui Huang

Chinese University of Hong Kong - Faculty of Law; 华东政法大学(East China University of Political Sicence and Law); University of New South Wales - Faculty of Law

Date Written: March 15, 2019

Abstract

Chinese Abstract: 近年来中国金融市场发展迅猛,新型金融组织、业态和产品不断涌现,给传统的机构型分业监管模式带来了重大挑战,与此相应中国金融监管进入大变革时代,在2017年11月设立国务院金融稳定发展委员会后,2018年3月国务院机构改革方案进一步对于监管体制做出重大调整,从原来的“一行三会”变成“一委一行两会”。此番改革的核心在于加强监管协调,引入功能监管和强化审慎监管,但仍然保留了以行业为划分基础的分业监管体制,包括原有的证监会和新设立的银行保险监督管理委员会。在监管逻辑上,应当借鉴经济学的丁伯根法则和公共选择理论,金融监管应当以统筹防范金融风险为中心,根据金融风险的分类界定监管政策目标,并配置相应的政策工具,最大程度地利用协同效应和减少冲突效应,并保障监管部门有能力抵制相关利益集团的负面影响。在改革路径上,虽然最近改革没有在根本上变革监管模式,但这符合我国现阶段金融特点和市场发展水平,值得充分肯定;但长期而言,随着中国金融市场的发展,金融监管体制应当借鉴国际经验,并结合具体国情,进行监管模式的转变和创新,从分业监管完全转为混业监管,而在混业监管模式中,不宜采用将各个分业监管机构简单合为一体的统合监管模式,而应采用目标(双峰)监管,按照行为监管和审慎监管的目标差异划分监管职责和设立监管机构。

English Abstract: China's financial markets have developed rapidly in recent years, with the emergence of new types of financial organizations, business models and financial products, bringing significant challenges for the traditional institutional sectors-based regulatory framework. In response, China's financial regulation has undergone significant reforms, including the establishment of the State Council Financial Stability and Development Committee in November 2017 and the organizational adjustment of the State Council in March 2018, as a result of which the previous 'one bank, three commissions' changes to 'one committee, one bank and two commissions'. The gist of this reform is to strengthen regulatory coordination, introduce functional regulation and improve prudential regulation, but still keeps the sectors-based regulatory framework. As to regulatory logic, in accordance with Tinbergen’s rule and public choice theory, financial regulation should be focused on the prevention of financial risks, identifying the regulatory objectives, finding corresponding policy tools, making most use of synergy effects and minimizing conflict effects, and ensuring that regulators are able to resist the influence of interest politics. In terms of reform approaches, the recent reform does not fundamentally change the regulatory model, which is consistent with the current local conditions in China, but in the long term, with the further development of the markets, China should, by learning from overseas experiences with due consideration of local conditions, make a paradigmatic change to its regulatory model, namely from sectors-based model to integrated model, and further choose the twin-peaks model rather than the single-regulator model.

Note: Downloadable document is in Chinese.

Keywords: 金融监管体制;分业监管;混业监管;监管工具;监管目标;法经济学 (Financial regulatory model; sectors-based regulation; integrated regulation; regulatory tools; regulatory objectives; law and economics)

JEL Classification: K22, G28

Suggested Citation

Huang, (Robin) Hui, 中国金融监管体制改革的逻辑与路径:国际经验与本土选择 (The Logics and Path of China’s Financial Regulatory Structure: International Experiences and Local Choice) (March 15, 2019). 2019(3) 法学家 [Jurist] 124-137 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3437713

(Robin) Hui Huang (Contact Author)

Chinese University of Hong Kong - Faculty of Law ( email )

Shatin, New Territories
Hong Kong
852-39431805 (Phone)
852-29942505 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.cuhk.edu.hk/people/huang-hui-robin.php

华东政法大学(East China University of Political Sicence and Law) ( email )

1575 Wanhangdu Rd.
Changning, Shanghai 200042
China

University of New South Wales - Faculty of Law ( email )

Sydney, New South Wales 2052
Australia
61-2-9385 9649 (Phone)
61-2-9385 1175 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
10
Abstract Views
167
PlumX Metrics