Boards' Reactions to Accounting for Income Tax Failures

39 Pages Posted: 20 Aug 2019

See all articles by Adam J. Olson

Adam J. Olson

University of Cincinnati - Department of Accounting

Paul Ordyna

University of Cincinnati

Date Written: July 25, 2019

Abstract

In this paper, we examine boards’ reactions to accounting for income tax (AFIT) failures compared to other types of accounting failures in an attempt to better understand AFIT and how it functions within a firm. Specifically, we investigate executive turnover decisions surrounding the announcement of AFIT control weaknesses and AFIT restatements compared to other types of control weaknesses and restatements, respectively. Relying on attribution theory and the uniqueness of AFIT, we argue and find that executive turnover is lower after AFIT control weaknesses compared to other control weaknesses and that executive turnover is higher after AFIT restatements compared to other restatements. We find no similar pattern among stock market reactions or auditor turnover, or around other types of control weaknesses and restatements. Overall, our study suggests that board perceptions of AFIT failures is different than other failures due to the unique characteristics and functions of AFIT.

Keywords: Taxes, CFO Turnover, CEO Turnover, Control Weaknesses, Restatements

Suggested Citation

Olson, Adam J. and Ordyna, Paul, Boards' Reactions to Accounting for Income Tax Failures (July 25, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438460 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3438460

Adam J. Olson (Contact Author)

University of Cincinnati - Department of Accounting ( email )

Cincinnati, OH 45221-0211
United States

Paul Ordyna

University of Cincinnati ( email )

Cincinnati, OH 45221-0211
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
28
Abstract Views
119
PlumX Metrics