Spoiler Alert: When the Supreme Court Ruins Your Brief Problem Mid-Semester

Perspectives: Teaching Legal Research and Writing, Vol. 27, No. 2, Fall 2019.

U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 645

5 Pages Posted: 21 Aug 2019 Last revised: 29 Feb 2020

See all articles by Margaret Hannon

Margaret Hannon

University of Michigan Law School

Date Written: August 1, 2019

Abstract

Partway through this past year’s winter semester (which is what we call it in Michigan), the Supreme Court ruined my favorite summary judgment brief problem while my students were working on it. I had decided to use the problem despite the Court’s cert grant and knowing it was just a matter of time before the Court issued its decision. In this essay, I share some of the lessons that I learned along the way. I conclude that, while I have not typically set out to use a brief problem on an issue pending in the Supreme Court, doing so has some meaningful benefits.

Keywords: legal writing, teaching, legal research, law school, legal research and writing, legal education, pedagogy

JEL Classification: K00

Suggested Citation

Hannon, Margaret, Spoiler Alert: When the Supreme Court Ruins Your Brief Problem Mid-Semester (August 1, 2019). Perspectives: Teaching Legal Research and Writing, Vol. 27, No. 2, Fall 2019., U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 645, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3439696

Margaret Hannon (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

HOME PAGE: https://www.law.umich.edu/FacultyBio/Pages/FacultyBio.aspx?FacID=mchannon

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
65
Abstract Views
391
rank
395,947
PlumX Metrics