Environmental Valuation by US Regulatory Agencies: Adequacy Challenges and Judicial Review

Posted: 18 Sep 2019

See all articles by Sroyon Mukherjee

Sroyon Mukherjee

West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences; London School of Economics

Date Written: September 9, 2019

Abstract

US regulatory agencies frequently use cost-benefit analysis (‘CBA’) in their decision-making, and several such CBAs have been challenged in court. This paper argues that in cases involving the valuation of environmental benefits, substantive judicial review of agency CBAs is, and should be, less deferential than most commentators would suggest. Direct challenges to agency CBAs can take two forms. First, a court may be asked to review whether the agency was authorised to rely on a CBA (if it did) or whether it was required to (if it did not). Second, the challenge may be directed at the adequacy of the CBA itself. The literature so far has mostly concentrated on the first category of cases; this paper focuses on the second. Several scholars favour a deferential standard of judicial review, primarily on the basis that CBA involves technical questions which agency experts, as opposed to generalist judges, are more qualified to answer. Since CBA typically involves monetisation of costs and benefits and environmental benefits are notoriously hard to quantify, the argument for judicial deference would appear to be even stronger in the context of environmental regulation. Based on a review of US appellate court decisions involving valuation of environmental benefits, I argue that the difficulties inherent in such valuation are not only technical or methodological – the kind that experts are arguably better equipped to address. Before dealing with methodological questions, i.e. how benefits are to be measured, the valuer must first determine which benefits are relevant – a determination which involves value judgments, questions of policy and statutory purpose. As an empirical matter, I show that courts do in fact engage with these questions in the judicial review of CBA. As a normative matter, based on an evaluation of the case law and the nature of questions at issue, I argue that this is how it should be.

Suggested Citation

Mukherjee, Sroyon, Environmental Valuation by US Regulatory Agencies: Adequacy Challenges and Judicial Review (September 9, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3450783

Sroyon Mukherjee (Contact Author)

West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences ( email )

12, LB Block, Sector III
Salt Lake City
Kolkata, West Bengal 700 064
India

London School of Economics ( email )

Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.lse.ac.uk/law/people/phd/sroyon-mukherjee

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
63
PlumX Metrics