Integrating Theories of Law Obedience: How Utility-Theoretic Factors, Legitimacy, and Lack of Self-Control Influence Decisions to Commit Low-Level Crimes

(Joint work with Berenike Waubert de Puiseau und Andreas Glöckner), Judgement and Decision Making, May 2019, S. 318-334.

17 Pages Posted: 28 Sep 2019

See all articles by Andreas Glöckner

Andreas Glöckner

Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods; University of Cologne

Berenike Waubert de Puiseau

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Emanuel V. Towfigh

EBS Law School; Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

Date Written: May 2, 2019

Abstract

We conducted two studies using a sample of students (Experiment 1, N=84) and the general public (Experiment 2, N=412) to assess the relative and unique effects of factors suggested by three major theories of law obedience: a utility-theoretic deterrence theory (Becker, 1968), the general theory of crime (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990), and the legitimacy model (Tyler, 1990). Six different types of low-level crime were considered. The probability of breaking the law increases with factors predicted by each of these theories, namely detection probability, expected fine, self-control, and legitimacy. All four factors uniquely contribute to predicting law obedience, effects are mainly additive, and no stable interaction effects are observed. The relative influence of the investigated factors varies between types of low-level crimes. This indicates that an integrative theory of why people obey the law needs to consider factors from various theories and allow for the relative influence of factors to differ among crimes. We observe systematic deviations from a basic utility-theoretic approach to law breaking. Individuals' tendency to obey the law is much higher than predicted by an approach taking into account detection probability, expected fines, and benefits only. The robust effects of interindividual differences concerning legitimacy and self-control as well as the finding that the tendency to break the law decreases with increasing benefit of the crime also conflict with a basic utility-theoretic approach to law-obedience.

Suggested Citation

Glöckner, Andreas and de Puiseau, Berenike Waubert and Towfigh, Emanuel V., Integrating Theories of Law Obedience: How Utility-Theoretic Factors, Legitimacy, and Lack of Self-Control Influence Decisions to Commit Low-Level Crimes (May 2, 2019). (Joint work with Berenike Waubert de Puiseau und Andreas Glöckner), Judgement and Decision Making, May 2019, S. 318-334., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3455953

Andreas Glöckner

Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods ( email )

Kurt-Schumacher-Str. 10
D-53113 Bonn, 53113
Germany

HOME PAGE: http://www.coll.mpg.de/team/page/andreas_gloeckner

University of Cologne ( email )

Richard-Strauss-Str. 2
Köln, 50931
Germany

HOME PAGE: http://soccco.uni-koeln.de/andreas-gloeckner.html

Berenike Waubert De Puiseau

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Emanuel V. Towfigh (Contact Author)

EBS Law School ( email )

Gustav-Stresemann-Ring 3
Wiesbaden, 65189
Germany
+49 611 7102-2253 (Phone)
+49 611 7102-10-2253 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.lehrstuhl-towfigh.de

Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods ( email )

Kurt-Schumacher-Str. 10
D-53113 Bonn, 53113
Germany
+49 228 91416-30 (Phone)
+49 228 91416-930 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.coll.mpg.de/team/page/emanuel_towfigh

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
67
Abstract Views
590
rank
390,196
PlumX Metrics