The Essence of Rights: An Unreliable Boundary?

Tridimas T and Gentile G, “The Essence of Rights: An Unreliable Boundary?” (2019) 20 German Law Journal 794

King's College London Law School Research Paper No. 2019-37

24 Pages Posted: 6 Oct 2019 Last revised: 3 Dec 2019

See all articles by P. Takis Tridimas

P. Takis Tridimas

Queen Mary University of London, School of Law; King's College London - The Dickson Poon School of Law; The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law

Giulia Gentile

King’s College London, Dickson Poon School of Law, Students

Date Written: September 20, 2019

Abstract

Article 52(1) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights lays down respect for the essence of right as one of the requirements that limitations on rights must respect. This provision is not innovative, as it formalizes into EU law the distinction between “core” and “periphery” of rights present in many national constitutions and in the ECJ and ECtHR case law. Nonetheless, the express reference to essence has given unprecedented resonance to that concept. Essence as the “limit of limits” has a Janus-like character. On the one hand, it pronounces that every fundamental right bears a minimum content which is ringfenced from interference by public and private actors. On the other hand, it stresses the malleability of rights and their social function. The core/periphery dichotomy reflects a balancing act moored in European legal tradition whose symbolism outperforms its utility as a judicial tool. This Article examines the essence clause of the Charter in light of the ECJ case law and the constitutional traditions of the Member States and assesses its role in the framework of fundamental rights protection in EU law. The Article first attempts a classification of rights limitations clauses in national constitutions, following which it discusses the interpretation of essence by the Spanish and the Italian Constitutional Courts. The Article then engages with a theoretical discussion of the concept of essence and examines the case law of the ECJ. Lastly, it looks at the limitations of the concept as a rights protection instrument in EU law.

Keywords: Essence of rights; fundamental rights; EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

JEL Classification: K4

Suggested Citation

Tridimas, P. Takis and Gentile, Giulia, The Essence of Rights: An Unreliable Boundary? (September 20, 2019). Tridimas T and Gentile G, “The Essence of Rights: An Unreliable Boundary?” (2019) 20 German Law Journal 794, King's College London Law School Research Paper No. 2019-37, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3457227

P. Takis Tridimas

Queen Mary University of London, School of Law ( email )

United Kingdom

King's College London - The Dickson Poon School of Law ( email )

Somerset House East Wing
Strand
London, WC2R 2LS
United Kingdom

The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law ( email )

Lewis Katz Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States

Giulia Gentile (Contact Author)

King’s College London, Dickson Poon School of Law, Students ( email )

Strand
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
96
Abstract Views
598
rank
323,556
PlumX Metrics