Effects of Market Size and Competition in Two-Sided Markets: Evidence from Online Dating

60 Pages Posted: 11 Oct 2019 Last revised: 10 Sep 2023

See all articles by Jessica Fong

Jessica Fong

University of Michigan Ross School of Business

Date Written: May 11, 2022

Abstract

A common finding in the theoretical matching literature is that a greater number of potential matches improves matching outcomes, whereas more competition worsens matching outcomes. However, it is unknown whether this finding holds empirically in decentralized markets, where agents can endogenously adjust their search behavior in response to changes in competition and number of potential matches (market size). This paper measures the effects of market size and competition size on search behavior and matching decisions using a large-scale randomized field experiment with an online dating application. The experiment provides a user-level information treatment: the number of men and women in the user's market. I find that on average, an increase in market size deters users from participating in the market. Conditional on participating, market and competition size influence matching decisions. An increase in market size causes users to become more selective, whereas competition causes users to become less selective. I discuss the implications of these endogenous changes in search behavior and selectivity on matching outcomes and explore potential mechanisms that can explain these empirical findings.

Keywords: digital markets, two-sided matching, platform design, online dating

Suggested Citation

Fong, Jessica, Effects of Market Size and Competition in Two-Sided Markets: Evidence from Online Dating (May 11, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3458373 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3458373

Jessica Fong (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Ross School of Business ( email )

701 Tappan Ave
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
343
Abstract Views
1,387
Rank
147,315
PlumX Metrics