An Empirical Study of Statutory Interpretation in Tax Law

101 Pages Posted: 30 Sep 2019

Date Written: September 28, 2019

Abstract

A substantial academic literature considers how agencies should interpret statutes. But few studies have considered how agencies actually do interpret statutes, and none has empirically compared the methodologies of agencies and courts in practice. This Article conducts such a comparison, using a newly created dataset of all IRS publications ever released, along with an existing dataset of court decisions. It applies natural language processing, machine learning, and regression analysis to map methodological trends and to test whether particular authorities have developed unique cultures of statutory interpretation.

It finds that, after Chevron, the IRS has increasingly made rules on normative policy grounds (like fairness and efficiency) rather than merely producing rules based on the “best reading” of the relevant statute (under any interpretive theory, like purposivism or textualism). Moreover, when the IRS does apply interpretive criteria, it has grown much more purposivist over time. In contrast, the Tax Court has not grown more normative and has followed the same trend toward textualism as most other courts. But although the Tax Court has become more broadly textualist, it prioritizes different interpretive tools than other courts, like Chevron deference and holistic-textual canons. This suggests that each authority adopts its own flavor of textualism or purposivism.

These findings complicate the literature on tax exceptionalism and the judicial nature of the Tax Court. They also inform ongoing debates about judicial deference, suggesting that Chevron does encourage agencies to engage in policy-based rulemaking. Most broadly, they provide an empirical counterpoint to the existing theoretical literature on statutory interpretation by agencies.

Keywords: Taxation, Federal Income Taxation, Statutory Interpretation, Legislation, Administrative Law, Chevron, Textualism, Purposivism, IRS, Tax Code, Empirical Legal Studies, Law and Economics, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Empirical Studies

Suggested Citation

Choi, Jonathan H., An Empirical Study of Statutory Interpretation in Tax Law (September 28, 2019). 95 New York University Law Review (2020, Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3460962 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3460962

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
85
Abstract Views
315
rank
296,262
PlumX Metrics