Equal Protection and the Male Gaze: Another Approach to State of New Hampshire v. Lilley

26 Pages Posted: 15 Oct 2019 Last revised: 21 Apr 2021

Date Written: October 3, 2019

Abstract

This Article uses New Hampshire v. Lilley, a case recently decided by the New Hampshire Supreme Court, as a starting point for an equal protection analysis of indecent exposure laws that distinguish between women and men. After discussing contemporary equal protection jurisprudence and historicizing these laws, this Article uses the film theorist Laura Mulvey’s concept of the “male gaze” to demonstrate how overbroad generalizations about sex and sexuality serve as the foundation for this legal distinction. This Article concludes by emphasizing that municipalities and states may continue to enact and enforce indecent exposure laws that reflect community standards, so long as they apply equally to women and men.

Keywords: indecent exposure, equal protection, male gaze, feminist jurisprudence

Suggested Citation

Mignanelli, Nicholas, Equal Protection and the Male Gaze: Another Approach to State of New Hampshire v. Lilley (October 3, 2019). 22 Journal of Gender, Race and Justice 265 (2019), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3463759

Nicholas Mignanelli (Contact Author)

Yale Law School ( email )

127 Wall Street
New Haven, CT 06510
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
81
Abstract Views
636
rank
419,529
PlumX Metrics