Director–Liability–Reduction Laws and Conditional Conservatism
Posted: 6 Oct 2019
Date Written: September 1, 2019
We study nonofficer directors’ influence on the accounting conservatism of U.S. public firms. Between 1986 and 2002, all 50 U.S. states enacted laws that limited nonofficer directors’ litigation risk but often left officer directors’ litigation risk unchanged. We find that conditional conservatism decreased after the staggered enactments of the laws, which we attribute to less nonofficer director monitoring of financial reporting in affected firms. Conservatism fell less when shareholder or debtholder power was high, consistent with major stakeholders moderating the influence of nonofficer directors. We verify that our results stem from reductions in the asymmetric timeliness of accruals and, specifically, its current assets components. We also show that affected firms switched away from Big N auditors more often, which reduced these firms’ commitment to conservative financial reports.
Keywords: litigation risk; corporate governance; D&O insurance; non-officer directors; board monitoring
JEL Classification: G14; G34; G38; K22; M41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation