Cognitive Ability, Wages, and Meritocracy
48 Pages Posted: 24 Sep 1996 Last revised: 11 Apr 2022
Date Written: July 1996
Abstract
This paper presents new evidence from the NLSY on the importance of meritocracy in American society. In it, we find that general intelligence, or g -- a measure of cognitive ability--is dominant in explaining test score variance. The weights assigned to tests by g are similar for all major demographic groups. These results support Spearman's theory of g. We also find that g and other measures of ability are not rewarded equally across race and gender, evidence against the view that the labor market is organized on meritocratic principles. Additional factors beyond g are required to explain wages and occupational choice. However, both blue collar and white collar wages are poorly predicted by g or even multiple measures of ability. Observed cognitive ability is only a minor predictor of social performance. White collar wages are more g loaded than blue collar wages. Many noncognitive factors determine blue collar wages.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects
By Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens
-
Estimating the Return to Schooling: Progress on Some Persistent Econometric Problems
By David Card
-
By James J. Heckman, Lance Lochner, ...
-
Life Cycle Schooling and Dynamic Selection Bias: Models and Evidence for Five Cohorts
-
By James J. Heckman and Edward Vytlacil
-
Earnings, Schooling, and Ability Revisited
By David Card