The Elastic Statute of Limitations on Claims for Refund: Why Old Claims May Still Be Open

Ambrosio, F. (2019). The Elastic Statute of Limitations on Claims for Refund: Why Old Claims May Still be Open. The CPA Journal, 89(10): 22-28.

7 Pages Posted: 31 Oct 2019 Last revised: 4 Aug 2022

See all articles by Fabio Ambrosio

Fabio Ambrosio

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: October 1, 2019

Abstract

After the IRS's loss in Weisbart v. U.S., recently revised Treasury Regulations indicate the IRS will reconsider all claims for refund previously disallowed on grounds similar to those in Weisbart, no matter how old. Therefore, the Anastasoff court did not apply the mailbox rule and essentially followed the IRS's position that the filing date for both aspects of the document (i.e., claim and delinquent return) was the date of receipt. In Weisbart, the payer obtained a four-month extension of time to file his 1991 tax return. tax return, which embedded a claim, eventually mailed on August 17, 1995, and received by the IRS four days after. The plain language of the IRS's commentary indicates that the IRS will reconsider all claims for refund previously disallowed on grounds similar to those in Weisbart - no matter how old they might be.

Keywords: Tax refunds, claims, statute of limitations, Weisbart

Suggested Citation

Ambrosio, Fabio, The Elastic Statute of Limitations on Claims for Refund: Why Old Claims May Still Be Open (October 1, 2019). Ambrosio, F. (2019). The Elastic Statute of Limitations on Claims for Refund: Why Old Claims May Still be Open. The CPA Journal, 89(10): 22-28., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3473903

Fabio Ambrosio (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
68
Abstract Views
396
Rank
636,875
PlumX Metrics