Is Federalization of Charity Law All Bad? What States Can Learn from the Internal Revenue Code

14 Pages Posted: 29 Oct 2019

See all articles by Melanie B. Leslie

Melanie B. Leslie

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Date Written: 2014

Abstract

I agree that the combination of state and federal law creates an impenetrable maze that charitable fiduciaries find overly difficult to negotiate. Yet I am reluctant to finger the Code as the primary culprit. In my view, state law deserves much of the blame for its own demise. For when it comes to legal issues at the core of charity law-the nondistribution constraint and the charitable purpose requirement-state law is a largely useless tool for guiding or disciplining charitable boards. This failure is not solely attributable to attorneys' general lack of resources or interest. The larger problem lies with the law itself. A compilation of the fuzziest of standards, state law gives no guidance to charitable fiduciaries. And charitable fiduciaries-volunteers with good intentions but little time and few resources-are uniquely in need of clear guidance.


Keywords: charity law, fiduciaries, non-distribution constraint, conflict of interest

Suggested Citation

Leslie, Melanie B., Is Federalization of Charity Law All Bad? What States Can Learn from the Internal Revenue Code (2014). Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 67, No. 6, 2014, Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3476677

Melanie B. Leslie (Contact Author)

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )

55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0266 (Phone)
212-790-0205 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
21
Abstract Views
217
PlumX Metrics