The Paradigm of Originalism: Israeli Constitutional Law and Legal Thought

Israel Law Review 52(3) 2019, pp 427–454

28 Pages Posted: 25 Nov 2019

Date Written: October 29, 2019

Abstract

This review essay challenges three main claims about originalism in American legal thought. While it affirms that originalism could be the Law of a legal system, it first challenges the mainstream idea that American originalism is the paradigmatic case in theory and in practice. Second, the essay confronts the normative justification that originalism ensures democracy based on the rule of law. Third, it interrogates the dichotomy between living constitutionalism and originalism regarding the use of history by arguing that originalism is a form of hegemony. The case study analyzed in this article is Israeli legal thought and practice after the enactment of the 1992 Basic Laws, with the focus on the right of equality.

Suggested Citation

Jabareen, Hassan, The Paradigm of Originalism: Israeli Constitutional Law and Legal Thought (October 29, 2019). Israel Law Review 52(3) 2019, pp 427–454. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3477273

Hassan Jabareen (Contact Author)

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem ( email )

Mount Scopus
Jerusalem, IL Jerusalem 91905
Israel

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
38
Abstract Views
128
PlumX Metrics